By Philip Schweier
August 30, 2012 - 07:53
Peculiar title for a column from a long-time
Superman fan like myself, but it will be made clear in a moment, as well as why
it was taken directly from Lois Lane’s Pulitzer-Prize winning article in Superman
Returns (2006).
Y’see, I was discussing movie re-boots with someone who is a casual super-hero
fan, which makes their opinions less biased and in many regards more legitimate,
from a layman’s point of view.
In the course of conversation, it was agreed that from a filmmaking standpoint,
it serves little purpose to simply retell the same origin story. This seems to
be the pit-fall of many filmmakers tasked with re-launching a film franchise
(cough*AmazingSpider-Man*cough).
Which begs the question: does a new Superman film need to be made in the first
place? Warner Bros, parent company of DC Entertainment, might argue yes,
because it is perhaps the company’s best-known character and thereby richest
property for commercial exploitation. And certainly fans would like to dilute
the memory of the lackluster Superman Returns.
But if there is no new ground to cover, what's the point?
During the years prior to Superman Returns, as one filmmaker
after another – Kevin Smith, Tim Burton, et al – tried to get the Superman
movie franchise resurrected, it was said by more than one comic book or film
pundit, “You have to tell his origin.”
No. You don’t.
For the simple reason that it was covered rather extensively in Superman:
The Movie (1979), starring Christopher Reeve.
Director Richard Donner (l) with Superman star Christopher Reeve (r)
I’m hopeful that when Man of Steel is released
next year, director Chistopher Nolan will not cover the same territory explored
by Richard Donner in Superman: The Movie. At least not
in the same way.
In Tim Burton’s Batman (1989), Bruce Wayne’s one-man war on crime was easily
explained without getting in the way of the overall story.
When Batman Begins (2005) was released, director Christopher Nolan
told a story significantly different from any previous film version of Batman.
He addressed such questions as: Why does he dress up like a bat, and where did
he get his training?
Michael Keaton as Batman (1989)
One of the better decisions director Bryan Singer made when directing Superman
Returns was he intended the movie to be a direct sequel to the
Christopher Reeve films. He built upon a history already established and was
able to avoid rehashing a lot of material already presented elsewhere.
Which brings me back to my original thought as to why the world doesn’t need
Superman. Instead, I feel that Warner Bros. and DC Entertainment would be
better served in adapting some of the lesser-known characters of the DC
Universe for film or television.
However, in order for DC Comics to maintain its momentum in screen adaptations
of its properties, the characters may have to undergo serious retooling to make
them appeal to a broader audience. But most comic book fans will no doubt
resent a movie or TV production tinkering with their favorite heroes. After
all, if you’re not going to respect the source material, you’re only going to
alienate your core audience.
Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman represent the top rung in the pantheon of DC
heroes. However, in 2011, a proposed Wonder Woman pilot failed to sell. Other
Justice League members might be ripe for adaptation, but their individual track
records are mediocre at best.
While Green Lantern (2011) box office earnings totaled more than
$219 million, according to imdb.com, it wasn’t really embraced by comic book
fans or mainstream movie audiences. The Flash (1990) lasted 22
episodes, and a proposed Aquaman pilot in 2006 failed to sell.
Moving down the ladder to lesser-known characters, success has been
minimal. Birds of Prey in 2002, but only lasted 13 episodes. The
Human Target (2010) ran for two seasons; an earlier version of the
same character lasted seven episodes in 1992.
Second Chances: Rick Springfield (l) starred as Christopher Chance in the 1992 version of The Human Target. Mark Valley (r) assumed the role in 2010.
Thanks to an established track record as part of the long-running Smallville’s
supporting cast, a show based on Green Arrow is set to debut this fall on CW.
But will audiences see more than just “Bruce Wayne with arrows?” And will fans
who embraced the character as presented on Smallville appreciate this revised
version? We’ll find out this fall, Wednesdays at 8 p.m.
If the show proves successful, it may open the door for lesser-known comic book
properties to be adapted for film or television. Who among us wouldn’t love to
see the success of Smallville or The Dark Knight
overshadowed by a bit player from left field.
Angel & the Ape, maybe...
Praise and adulation? Scorn and ridicule? E-mail me at
philip@comicbookbin.com